More More on Iran and/or U.S./Iran War.

Previously posted on my Facebook Page or response (in a Friend’s Page) to the same issue.

THE United States contributes $570 million to $750 million of taxpayer money to NATO, annually. President Trump lowered it from 22 percent to 16 percent in 2019 but still the top money. For 2025, however, the U.S. gave more (google stuff because numbers vary but in billions$). Meanwhile, Europe or NATO countries' economic woes suffer more due to delays or stoppage of oil shipments via Strait of Hormuz because they are already reeling from the Ukraine war since Russia was their top energy importer for years until 2022. 

       Pre-U.S. operation in Iran, the IRGC massacred thousands of its people in a matter of days or weeks. Question: Would it be "better" that the U.S. didn't make a move? Protests in Iran have been happening due to economic murk for years now. Mr Trump took out the IRGC's brain or the hardcore Ayatollah Ali Khamenei a.k.a. the Supreme Leader after talks failed. Iran's best move is to return to the table and talk. The world suffers from the looming oil crisis but what about the Iranian people? 

       Before this tempest, Iran joined the BRICS trade bloc and shook hands with Saudi Arabia. Those were moves to fix the economy as China increased oil purchase. But the people wanted faster changes and reforms. So the protests. Until the massacre happened. 

       I don't know why some even say the U.S. "masterminded" the killings... I was anti-U.S. (hawkish) foreign policy for most of my old life until Washington prioritized trade deals over military aggro in Donald Trump time but how would a POTUS react to a massacre such as that horror in Iran? Ignore it because it's them, not us? Then we need to go back to Bretton Woods 1944 etcetera and why America is the de facto cop of the world. I may disagree in many aspects but… ☮️☮️☮️

Associated Press: “Counterterror chief Joe Kent resigns and breaks with Trump on Iran.” / Reuters: “Trump was warned that strikes on Iran would embolden the regime, say sources.” I am both baffled and annoyed by reactions to President Trump’s response to Iran’s massacre of thousands of its people, after negotiations to avoid a U.S. military operation, didn’t work. So it’d be better to just ignore the horror because it’s them, anyways–not us? In my personal experience in the Philippines, would it be “better” if the U.S. didn’t aid the coup that took out the 20-year Marcos dictatorship in 1986? The regime wasted over 3,000 (official count) in two decades. Iran’s vicious IRGC shot dead over 30,000 in a matter of days! 

      Yet POTUS tried to avoid this war or its escalation. Must I rant why per The D’s foreign policy playbook? Tell me, if this is Barack Obama or George W. time, what’d they do? Sit back and just watch as Iranian families bury their dead in mass graves? More deaths to come? Yet after the Supreme Leader was erased, Iran’s leadership should have opted to go back to the table and talk about an end to hostilities, for the sake of their own people. Still, they don’t. Yet I concur with Washington’s response to Iran’s “easy” wastage of humanity: “You can’t do that!” 🇺🇸☮️🇮🇷

THE relatively higher cost of gasoline (per gallon), as usual, is pitched as a political caterwaul feed than a living imperative issue. Yet aren’t we in America used to this fluctuating trend? The current price at the pump aligns with how it was just a few years ago, in 2022: $4 to $5. Adjusted per inflation, that was the average in the 1970s during the global oil crisis. America’s average since 2000 is $1.50. Yet look at Europe: Today? $9 per gallon. The global average is $4. Yet “ordinary” costs in some in Asia (Hongkong) and Europe (Norway) are already around $8 to $10. My point? Chill. This is not World War 3. ⛽️🗽⛽️

All About Iran.

Previously posted on my Facebook Page.

A smart individual chastised me for issuing my “conclusion” about Left-wing dissent’s “selectivity” as blurred by their gargantuan hate for Donald Trump. I based my insight/opinion on available fatalities data in Iran (before the U.S. hit days ago). He reckoned my data is not a “universally-accepted” fact or news report. Universally-accepted. Uh huh? Meaning, both Left and Right must accept the info to warrant veracity? In these divided times?

      Anyhow, here: Iranian government data: 3,117 deaths. Human Rights Activists News Agency: 7,007. Independent/Media Estimates: Exceeds 30,000–36,500, which the media, such as The Guardian, picked up. Certainly those numbers are higher than “2 dead in Minnesota.” 

       Yahoo: “Trump says 'the big wave' of military action in Iran is 'coming soon'.” A current events/POTUS fact: Donald Trump is hot and high on “big talk.” Still surprised, eh? But since his MOAB hits in Afghanistan and Syria in April 2017, his “big talk,” to me, is more a chess move tactic than a hint of Rambo mayhem. Examples. His erasures: 2019, ISIS’ Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi; 2020, IRGC/Quds’ Qasem Soleimani; 2026, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Add, power-removal of dictator Nicolas Maduro. Technically, those are not wars. War is the Ukraine War (since 2014 or 2022) or Iran vs Iraq of the 1980s. So easy with dramatics, people! 

       Yahoo: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth leaves door open for boots on the ground in Iran.” War engagements have immensely evolved since the 20-year Afghanistan War, at least for the U.S. Less “boots on the ground” or non-escalation of hostilities in favor of political/economic pressures ensue. Only the Arab League, not Israel, could heighten this shudder into a full-blown conflagration. And The League, starring Saudi Arabia, doesn’t favor a prolonged mess. So is China, the top buyer of Middle East oil (including Riyadh and Tehran’s shipments). Until his hands were forced, Mr Trump favored trade on the table, not wars on the front. 

       Yahoo: “Defense secretary says 'regime change' was not the goal of strikes, but urges Iranians to 'take advantage'.” / Reuters: “U.S. officials skeptical of Iran regime change after killing of supreme leader.” Regime change, of course, is powered or executed by the U.S. But the change in leadership, following an election, is the people’s decision. If you are an older Filipino (who was an adult in 1986) and has gotten old watching geopolitics unfold, you know what that is. Iran: The Supreme Leader is out so Iranians have got to recover from the rubble of civil unrest and economic murk. 🇺🇸☮️🇮🇷

AND More Rant. 

WHEN I read about Americans “comparing” actual dictatorship deaths or evil regime deaths elsewhere, I feel the horror of those carnage is diminished or “mellowed down.” Sometimes I feel offended. Are we downplaying actual deaths elsewhere by comparing all these with internal America? Like, 2 dead in Minnesota were mourned over the 6,216 dead in Iran in the same week or month. But let’s see. 

       The deadliest riot in the U.S. happened in 1863, the New York Draft Riots, 120 people killed. Others: Tulsa Race Massacre (1921): 50 to 300 deaths. East St. Louis Riot (1917): Estimates suggest 40 to 200 deaths. LA Riots (1992): 63 people were killed. Red Summer (1919): Racial tensions across 38-40 cities led to hundreds of deaths.

Yet I couldn’t compare those days alongside years of extra-judicial killings, in the Philippines, for example. Maybe America imprisoned many, silenced or killed, but still I couldn’t compare. I am sorry. In the case of current-day Iran, I don’t really give a hoot that the U.S. launched this attack as long as the “leader” who ordered the killing of thousands in a few days–is taken out. If the U.S. didn’t do anything, then I will complain. 

       As of 25 January 2026, the total death toll estimates ranged from 3,117 people (per the Iranian government) to upwards of 36,500 people. Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA): 7,007 verified deaths. Independent/Media Estimates (High-End): Reports citing medical sources, morgue staff, and leaked intelligence documents have suggested the death toll could be significantly higher, with some estimates exceeding 30,000–36,500 (which the media, such as The Guardian, picked up). 

       In 20 years of Marcos dictatorship (which ended in 1986). Estimates of EJK deaths: 1,500 to over 3,000 victims. By Historian Alfred McCoy: 3,257. I am talking about 20 years. 🇺🇸☮️🇮🇷

STUFF. Hegseth and Arlington. Migrant Issue. MacKenzie and Melinda’s Billions.

HEGSETH and ARLINGTON. <> Meme: Defense chief Pete Hegseth removed ex-State Secretary Gen. Colin Powell (d. 2021) from Arlington’s “Notable Americans” list. Etcetera. Fact: Mr Hegseth did not remove the physical graves or “all records of non-white individuals” from Arlington National Cemetery, but his office did oversee the removal of specific online, curated web pages that highlighted Black, Hispanic, and female veterans–and listed them under a collective category. Meanwhile, Mr Powell remained accessible under a broader, non-categorized section: “Prominent Military Figures.” 

       <>Removal of Curated Lists. Or those specific, dedicated web pages that highlighted the stories of Black, Hispanic, and female service members (otherwise categorized per DEI) were removed and instead listed as per "Digital Content Refresh," highlighting service members based on their patriotism rather than through the lens of race or gender. I concur. In case, an individual “military figure” or soldier/serviceperson is a Filipino (like many of my kin) then we Filipinos celebrate and memorialize them as a people, ourselves–to the world. Arlington is for ALL soldiers who served in a war or two. Done. ☮️🗽☮️

MIGRANT ISSUE. <>NBC: “Border czar Tom Homan warned broad ICE raids risked public support.” I don’t understand why the Left obstructs the government’s mandate to fix the immigration crisis, when they didn’t in Barack Obama’s years. If “activists” don’t get in the way, there’ll be less mess or violence/deaths could be avoided. <>CBS: “Fewer than 14 Percent of those ICE arrested have violent criminal records, data shows.” Let’s do the numbers then: <>An additional 4 million was added to the total number of undocumented from 2021 to 2024; 14 percent of 4 million is 560,000. Mr Trump has so far (2025) deported over 600,000; so there’s still a deficit of 3 million and 400,000. But “crime records” aren’t necessarily the crux of the removals here. 

       During his two terms (2009–2016), Barack Obama deported over 3 million people. In his 1st term, he tallied 400,000 removals on average. When Mr Obama left office, undocumented number was around 10+ million, which is pretty much the number when Mr Trump left White House in 2020, although he removed 932,000 in total. (Removals happen but crossings continue.) The problem: In Joe Biden’s 2021-2024. Crossings were 1 million average. So as Trump II sits, the undocumented number was 14 million. That's THE crisis!

      Ergo: Migrants are vetted from criminal records or ties with drug cartels but the sheer influx of migrants in Mr Biden’s time was astounding per immigration fiscal management. Hint: Then NYC Mayor Eric Adams spent $6.9 billion in taxpayer money to feed, house and care for the 700,000+ migrants that the city welcomed, from 2022-2024. By the way, ICE is under Homeland Security per budget; FEMA is also under HS. You dig? 🗽🏃‍♀️🏃

DIVORCE BILLIONS. My reaction to a meme that says if MacKenzie and Melinda put money into a newspaper that doesn’t “kowtow with fascists,” then we are cool. Here: <>MacKenzie received $38 billion in her divorce with Jeff Bezos; she was a research assistant and administrative assistant before marriage. Melinda was a marketing manager before marriage; after divorce with Bill Gates, she is now worth $31 billion + other money coming from other assets.

      So why not form a foundation together? MacKenzie, $37+ billion; Melinda, $30+ billion. Initial funds to address Sub Saharan Africa's health and hunger problems. They can still keep a few millions to invest in their own companies and (probably) prove that they could build a billion-dollar empire as well. While they also give time and effort to manage their Africa project, which could also earn to be self-sufficient in time. Why not give the money back to those who most need them, right? And please, people, no blah-blah about fascism or whatever political crap. 

      BTW I read the Washington Post everyday. I don't think the articles "kowtow to fascists" at all. The paper is actually very “biased” against you-know-who. 💸🏢💸

MY EVERYDAY THOUGHTS. Discussion lead: Defund. ICE. Border Crossings. U.S. Crimes. And Stuff.

<>Defund! Passion. My "defund" wish: The U.S. military spending, $850 billion, which is almost 4x the budget of China’s “Defense.” Consider that the CCP/PLA had to “defend” (if ever) a population that is 4x larger than the U.S. 

       Meanwhile, a compelling lead to the “Defund!” discussion is Bill Clinton’s Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, the largest crime bill in U.S. history. The budget was $30 billion ($65 billion in current money). In that year, the U.S. experienced 42.4 million criminal victimizations, 26 percent were violent or deadly. ☮️🗽☮️

<>Defund ICE? ICE's budget is around $10 billion, which is under Homeland Security’s (proposed) $66+ billion budget. Mr Trump proposed a double ($112.4 billion) in the onset of 2025. Federal and government budgets for migrant sheltering vary. Hint: NYC alone spent $1.7 billion in 2024. 

       Meanwhile, I view the “2 dead in Minnesota” as an immigration per se issue, more than it is a federal law enforcement program or a Left vs Right caterwaul. Please, continue reading. ☮️🗽☮️

<>Deaths are a daily fact among migrants crossing towards the U.S. border. In 1998, a record 8,000+ migrants died trying to cross. In recent years, the deadliest tally was 895 deaths in 2022 (surpassing 2021’s 560). 2025: At least 30 to 32 reported deaths, equaling the record set in 2004. 

       A significant stop to illegal border crossings would mean less migrant pursuit in U.S. soils. Less violence, less deaths. 2025: Crossings dropped to lowest levels in over 50 years. The U.S. Border Patrol recorded approximately 237,538 encounters with migrants in fiscal year 2025, a dramatic drop from over 1.5 million in 2024 and over 2.2 million in 2022. ☮️🗽☮️

<>Violent crime, border crossing, mass shootings. <>When Barack Obama deported a record number of migrants (4,000 average in his first term) and Joe Biden let in a record number of migrants (at times 4,000-6,000 a day, from 2021 to 2024), the Left was cool and quiet. 2025: Lowest number of U.S. mass shootings in 5 years. Peak: 2021 (689). 

       Also, the largest 1 year drop in U.S. homicides, 20 percent, was tallied in 2025. Major cities recorded a 21 percent drop in homicides compared to 2024 and a 44 percent decrease from the 2021 peak. Yes, that’s the reason why I am more scared of winter ice this year, and not Trump’s ICE. ☮️🗽☮️

MORE about “2 Dead in Minnesota.” Two Filipinos weigh in.

My response to a Friend's Facebook post.

MAYBE I am cold. As a grandfather-old Filipino who lived through 20 years of dictatorship, countless wasted or "salvaged," dozens fatally shot in protest rallies, not to mention countryside wars and coups that I covered (including February 1986) and then living in affluent America and 2 deaths in Minnesota? 

       Uhh. Two deaths around circumstances that are absurd (you may interpret "absurd")? I am baffled. I can somehow understand the magnificent drama among Americans but some Filipinos ride along??? 

       In the same week that the 2nd person was shot, 6,126 protestors in Iran were erased by the dreaded IRGC. That, that massacre is THE news to me. Closer to the horror of my experience. But 2 deaths in Minnesota are such a big deal that the other side of the eerie divide calls it Nazi-era or dictatorship? 2 deaths. 

       Meanwhile, talking about Minnesota? What I could relate with in anger? The state government's billion$ social services corruption is drowned out by the 2 deaths. Koraps! That would drive me to the streets to protest. 

       Another bizarre fact in the U.S. is, the Left's response to Minnesota mutes the collective response when another mass shooting occurs (mass shootings that exponentially spike since Columbine 1999). And look, they have a betting site called Polymarket. (Worse than Pinoy uziseros!) Bet if Trump will attack Iran or not. Many already won after Venezuela although it was a regime change, not invasion. (Many lost per Greenland.) Yup, that's how Americans "view" carnage or shootings as they cuddle their "120.5 guns per 100." 

       I have been living in the U.S. for years. What concerns me here is the mental crisis, which ushers in this kind of Minnesota distress. In some cold, cold way (snow outside my house), I'd say this gargantuan drama indeed aligns with "long covid" which earns a drama king and drama queen "paid work leave" or unemployment benefit. And lots of FB likes. 

       I am sort of glad that I am a Filipino so much so that when Asheville (where I live) was hit by a calamity in September 2024, I simply shrugged it off. I live/d and my rice was untouched by the hurricane. 

Facebook Friend: “I have lived through, and struggled against, the same dictatorship, Pasckie. I have also suffered captivity and torture from rebels. I riled against willful killings, whether committed by soldiers or extremists.”

AS I already somehow reiterated above, “killings” in America aren't parallel with “dictatorship killings” in those years. We can't even compare EJKs or “salvagings” with mass shootings here. 

I am not saying the "2 dead in Minnesota" isn't tragic. Or should we compare ICE holding cells with the "torture from captivity from rebels" (that you experienced) or from soldiers (that I covered)? Migrant kids in foster homes or DOJ shelters have computers and flatscreen TV. I can't even compare those adult migrants held before deportation or asylum with Rikers Island but maybe in Guantanamo (what I read). 

       Yes, I can't parallel the events that led to the 2 shootings with how Marcos' soldiers snatched protestors then, then dumped somewhere. But the way media or social media project Minnesota to the world is even worse: Nazi Germany time? 2 deaths, video'ed and all, with thousands or millions burned in Sobibor? Is Trump is Hitler? ICE is Gestapo? 

       What scares me in America is not Trump or ICE but the 120.5 guns per 100 and the unabated spate of mass shootings due to hate and mental crisis. Today, there's one Louisiana shooting, 6 wounded. No one posted that per my Homepage. Thank God, no one is dead (as of the minute I read the news). But are we in a war or dictatorship in the U.S. right now as trumpeted by the media? No. 

       Minnesota is one of 50 states. Right now I am on Hulu watching a TV series and drinking beer. There's dangerous ice outside due to the snow. Not ICE. And if ever ICE comes to me, I will not kick and break the tail light of their van. Sheer common sense

Facebook Friend: “I’ll have to stop engaging here, Pasckie, because we’ll see no end to whataboutisms. You’re happy with how things are under D’rump, others are not, me included. Let’s leave it at that.”

I AM never happy with any POTUS as long as the military budget stays 4x higher than China. But then if I don't "hate" him as many seem bent to, I just look at his policies (vis a vis my own experience), yet I am automatically judged as "D'rump." 

       I disagreed big time with Barack Obama on immigration (as a Filipino) and foreign policy (as an anti-war activist) but since the passion isn't high on hate during his terms compared with Trump, I don't think my Barack criticisms were even heard (regardless that I published a newspaper here in Asheville). 

       There is no grown-up talk about Washington policies when Donald Trump is in the picture, I guess. I somehow expect to learn from you about Washington foreign policy but again, I am dismissed as "pro Trump." ☮️🗽☮️

Constitutional Rights. First Amendment and Second Amendment. Minnesota.

Responses to my Facebook post/s. First line, or highlighted quoted lines, are by commenters to my post.

<>“Constitutional rights and freedom of speech." Yes, but NOT in front of a gun. Even if a damn cartel sicario is the one pointing a gun at my face, yet he yells: "Stop" or motions for me to stop, sheer common sense tells me to stop. Repeat: Especially if there’s one or more people in my car, or I am around people (as in a mass of protestors). 

       If after the fact, I believe my “constitutional rights and freedom of speech” are violated, then there you go. That’s the job of civil rights attorneys and cause-oriented legal experts. 

<>“Right to bear arms is our 2nd amendment right.” In fact, let me stretch that: There is “gun carry” in Minnesota. Yet deductive reasoning or sense asks me, “Why would I carry my damn gun to where law enforcement, guns royale, are all over. And where protest adrenaline or rage are louder than thunder?” Would I calm down yet still head out to where the shoutings are and protest, legit and smarter.

       

<>“Exercise those rights and must bend the knee to not get murdered in our streets.” Compliance before a cop who told me to stop–as in driving the car on the shoulder of a road or oblige to frisking–are examples of police/civilian interactions. Would you go ahead and drive faster or wrestle a cop because it is a “civil right” to refuse frisking? Do you? 

       Next, what if all these happen, with your child in the car? Because there are people around with cellphone cams to record the “murder” and disrespect of your “constitutional right,” tell me. But you can be smarter than dramatic. Let `em and then sue; in fact you may win huge money and/or get donations via GoFund. But you need to be alive to enjoy those. You dig? 

       

<>“No longer living in the America that my forefathers fought to protect.” Actually, they did fight for those. Founding fathers. Democracy, civil rights, all the amendments. They fought a real revolution or war for those. But they didn’t say “abuse” or overstretch those. They drafted and ratified those rights for your protection as an American. 

       We enjoy all these privileges of Democracy and the First Amendment so much that we overdo them. Challenge the Constitution while crossing the thin line between “legal” and “illegal,” yeah? Insult the head of state and law enforcement because it is your First A? Unleash your rage versus the “New Hitler,” yeah? 

       Other nations don’t have these privileges. Look at current Iran. Soldiers don’t yell at you to stop. Soldiers don’t wrestle you to the ground to handcuff you. They just shoot you, in front of people. I experienced those. Hey, go cuss at a head of state, the bodyguard will kick you right there or snatch you, toss you in a black SUV, and drive you to your death. Those are real life elsewhere. 

       Sure, it is your right to cuss at anybody, right? So what if someone in the streets, someone who doesn’t like you, throws all imaginable Samuel L. Jackson “f” words in your face? Smile and say, “Yes, okay. That is your Freedom of Speech.” So cuss back I guess? Is that what the Founding Founders taught us? 

       So you are telling me that we in America could be “losing” the sublimity of democracy that John Adams (and the Founding Fathers) fought for. First of all, those were the 1700s, these are the 2020s. Life has evolved and so the words Democracy and the “right to bear arms” must not be interpreted per 1788. 

       If Thomas Jefferson or James Madison are alive now, I sure know what they’re gonna say. Yet those words will be taken as truths or “constitutional” per Left or Right. You reckon? ☮️🗽☮️

STUFF. Security. NATO. Greenland. And Donald Trump.

Response to a Friend’s Facebook page/post. 

I AM a bit bothered by the word "security" these days but I do recognize leadership SOPs. Yet per Mr Trump's playbook, his trade tact outweighs his balancing act in regards to doves/hawks in his foreign affairs agenda. Clearly, he is not a fan of NATO (he already lowered U.S. share in 2019). He doesn't favor too much military expenditures yet we know that the Pentagon's Defense budget keeps on spiking. That is an American fact, regardless that China's military budget is 4x less. 

       President Trump's major issue with the EU isn't Greenland (as media narrates). It is Ukraine. The EU still backs up Kyiv with military aid, irrelevant of Europe's economic murk. 

       Ergo, while Don keeps the hawks in Washington calm, he also issues his dovish agenda. That is tough. The reason why he sold new arms in Asia and Saudi Arabia yet he pursued peace. 

BEFORE Joe Biden, and while Angela Merkel was in power, the EU was cool with Russia. Europe needs Moscow's oil and gas; Norway isn't enough. The reason the economy stays below 1 percent is they lost that fuel (although some EU members continue to buy from Moscow/Gazprom actually; some via India). 

       Regardless of the war, Russia is still #1 natural gas exporter and #2 in oil (exports). Per Trump, the only way to deal with Ukraine is to end the war. Let the disputed (secessionist) Donbas region decide for themselves. Then talk about Ukraine’s rare earth and wasted natural resources. That is the issue anyway, going back to Euromaidan in 2014. The EU wanted these resources. They believe a war will do that as though we are in the 17th century still when the West could easily impose, via military aggression.

THE fact of the (current) world is, when a country purchases a territory, that is a corporate budget and the upkeep is shared with the government, and so on and so forth. So if Denmark sells Greenland, that'd be the lowdown.

       You see, China has been “quietly” buying lands globally since the Deng Xiaoping years, after Mao Zedong's death. But they don’t do it a-la America or Europe. You know I mean? They don’t like drama. While the world busies itself from all-Trump, China’s BRI, or Belt and Road Initiative, or trade expansionism carries on. ☮️☮️☮️