Time: “‘Pro-Life’ Liz Cheney Explains Why Her Fellow Republicans Should Back Harris.” Why wouldn't Liz instead enlist as a Democrat? I am no Conservative or Liberal but it'd be less alienating if she decides for certain her party allegiance. No wonder she lost the Republican Primary in 2022 to Harriet Hageman. The margin of defeat was the 2nd worst for a House incumbent in the last 60 years. Yet when I think about her dad Dick, I definitely have more to say. πππ€¨
Or let me just share an Mother Jones article, Sept/Oct 2006 issue. “Sweet Subpoena” by James Ridgeway, on the Dick Cheney part.
<>Grounds for impeachment? Congressional investigators digging into the aforementioned questions cannot ignore the possibility of impeachment proceedings against Vice President Dick Cheney, who figures prominently in almost every one of the scandals engulfing the administration. It was Cheney who ran the government’s response to the 9/11 attacks without constitutional authority, at one point ordering shoot-downs of commercial planes and what would turn out to be a medevac helicopter; who led the secret meetings of administration officials and oilmen to set energy policy; who allowed Ahmed Chalabi to play the U.S. government like a violin; who very well may be the origin of the whisper campaign that culminated in the Plame leak; and, of course, it was Cheney’s former employer (and source of continuing deferred compensation paychecks) that benefited enormously from no-bid contracts in Iraq.
Judicial Watch, the conservative legal outfit in Washington, has unearthed an email dated March 5, 2003, sent by an Army Corps of Engineers official whose name had been blacked out, that said of a pending deal under which Halliburton would rebuild the Iraqi oil industry, “We anticipate no issue since the action has been coordinated w VP’s office.” There’s plenty more where that came from; whether any of Cheney’s actions constitute “high crimes and misdemeanors” is for Congress, and the nation, to debate. ππ½π
Photo: The Intercept.