THOUGHTS About The News.

Previously posted on my Facebook Page.

Reuters: “U.S. prepares ‘toughest sanctions’ on Iran as pressure shifts toward China.” This war or wars per se in the Middle East is a complex beast, indeed. Of course, Iran is used to economic sanctions, experts would say. But what if Tehran’s chief trade partner, BRICS bro, and top oil buyer China actually shows up in the picture. The CCP isn’t so hot on military conflicts but a continuing Gulf crisis could adversely affect Beijing’s FDIs in MENA and purchase of oil from the region (China is world’s #1 oil importer). 

       Hence, the U.S. prepares to roll out terms or "toughest sanctions in history" against Iran, combining a naval blockade with aggressive financial isolation. Mr Trump calls “economic D-Day," the strategy increasingly targets China—which purchases over 80 percent of Iran's seaborne oil—by pressuring Beijing to halt its economic lifeline to Tehran. The measures are meant to severely restrict Iran’s access to global funds and military financing. Bottomline, the U.S. is pressing China to cooperate, pointing out that because China relies on the Gulf for roughly 50 percent of its energy needs, stabilizing the region and reopening the Strait of Hormuz aligns with Chinese interests. Makes sense. (Visual: Global Panorama.) 🇺🇸☮️🇮🇷 

Associated Press: “Trump threatens lawsuit over report disputing National Guard deployment on crime.” The same with ICE deployments or operations, local (Left-wing) leaderships defy or refuse them. Anyhow, I observe that Mr Trump’s “scare tactics” work. The end justifies the means?

      This fact: National crime rates are continuing a historic downward trend through mid-2026, building on record drops from 2025. Data from the Council on Criminal Justice shows mid-2026 homicide rates dropped roughly 18 percent compared to 2025, putting the country on track for multi-decade or century-long lows. (Photo: Reuters.) 🏛🗽🏛

Sometimes I am compelled to explain or elaborate on the subject of–why some foreigners (or immigrants) in America don’t drive. It’s not necessarily because they don’t want to learn (many know how to) or don’t have the financial resources to buy a vehicle. In many countries, people depend on PUVs or public transport (or they walk) so owning a private car is more of luxury than necessity. The cost of gasoline (with or without a global oil crisis) is also prohibitively expensive. Those who own automobiles are either very rich or use the vehicles/s for business. 

       So those who move to car-useful America are already “culturally-conditioned” not to rely on cars so much so that, for example, those Filipinos who live in subway-equipped cities like New York City, only use their cars when driving out of town (if they don’t instead avail of the Greyhound). Cars are for extreme situations or emergencies. 

       Meanwhile, in the U.S. (except in NYC), it is imperative to drive because public rides (not including Uber et al) aren’t generally available and there’s not much pedestrian-walks. More so, the most important (public/business) infrastructures are located in areas that will only be reached by driving. 🚗🚎🚙

Fox: “Charter plane crashes in western Alaska, killing all 8 people on board.” Again, these accidents or (deadly) mishaps seem “ordinary” if you check official data. As of late June 2026, the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives has recorded roughly (only) 44 total global aviation incidents, which is pretty much the annual average. Although tracking numbers vary depending on whether the count includes commercial airliners, cargo flights, military mishaps, or smaller private aircraft.

       I honestly doubt this info or stat. Let’s face the horrid fact: AI has been “test-running” air transportation controls, I believe. Hit and miss? I don’t know. But that’s the eventual reality in any form of transport systems as AI gets deep into human activity. ✈️😰✈️

The loud or bold demarcation between progressives (democratic socialists?) and liberals or moderates in the Left these days is not really surprising, as political party extremes get blurred in the 21st century. The Left/Right stereotypes have been muddled. Or in a kind of positive way, the crisscrossing of party principles and interfaced ideologies means (at least to me) people are digging into individual policies over traditional standards? 

      On the Right side, I can easily identify the “changes,” especially in regards the issue of war or military budgets, and although their line of reasoning differs with mine somehow, the way the (new) Left views its old anti-war fervor confuses me. Are the progs actually anti-war or anti-Trump? (Didn’t The D favor a dovish playbook or a hawkish template?) Or why the zeal for Zohran M. and his crew, and where was the enthusiasm in Bernie Sanders’ years? 👈✊👉